[Linux-HA] Handling colocation constraints with more than 2 entries
andreas.kurz at linbit.com
Mon Oct 4 14:36:21 MDT 2010
On 10/04/2010 05:36 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 04:01:50PM +0100, Matthew Richardson wrote:
> I've been playing with pacemaker for a while now, and have recently
> seena user stung by an issue I had when I first started - namely that
> colocation constraints are limited to 2 entries, unless sets are used.
> colocation ok inf: A B
> is allowed (obviously!)
> colocation sets_ok inf: A (B) (C)
> is also allowed.
> colocation not_ok inf: A B C
> isn't valid, though a user might expect it to be equal to the set-based
>> Hmm, last time I looked it worked. How do you know that it's not
I think what Matthew means is:
colocation ok inf: A B ... produces a colocation constraint A-follows-B
colocation not_ok inf: A B C ... implicitely configures a resource set
expressing C-follows-B-follows-A, which is exatly the other way round.
colocation sets_ok inf: A (B) (C) ... configures three resource sets
that behave like (as a lot of user seem to expect from the previous
Dejan, what are your thougts about let the shell "hide" the reversed
behavior of colocation resource sets and let this:
colocation not_ok inf: A B ( C D ) F G
<rsc_colocation id="not_ok" score="INFINITY" >
<resource_set id="collocated-set-1" sequential="true">
<resource_set id="collocated-set-2" sequential="false">
<resource_set id="collocated-set-3" sequential="true">
... or convince Andrew to change resource sets to _not_ have the same
colocation semantics as groups ... whatever is easier ;-)
> I would like to suggest 2 potential solutions to this:
> 1) (simple) Provide a warning/error message when someone constructs this
> invalid constraint.
> 2) (more complex) Translate this constraint to a meaningful set - i.e
> change 'A B C' to 'A (B) (C)'
> I'm not sure whether or not the 2nd option makes sense or whether it
> adds some extra level of confusion or uncertainty to its behaviour.
> Any comments? I'm happy to do some work to submit a patch to the shell
> to at least do the basic checking, though this might not be the best
> place (or indeed the best patch) to achieve these, if people think
> they're worthwhile suggestions.
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
More information about the Linux-HA