[Linux-HA] Master_slave doesn't failover
achapela.rexistros at gmail.com
Mon Jun 23 08:12:57 MDT 2008
Andrew Beekhof escribió:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:05, Adrian Chapela
> <achapela.rexistros at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Andrew Beekhof escribió:
>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 17:45, Adrian Chapela
>>> <achapela.rexistros at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello, in the past I have a problem with Pacemaker. This problem was a
>>>> inncesary suffling of master/slave resource
>>>> Now I can't do a failover. I started two heartbeat servers and the mysql
>>>> servers startup OK, heartbeat is OK and all constraints seems to be OK.
>>>> I failed the master mysql server. Heartbeat detects the problem but It
>>>> doesn't do failover. If I stop the heartbeat, the result is the same.
>>> So it was left as stopped?
>>> What failure stickiness are you using?
>> This are the values:
>> <nvpair id="cib-bootstrap-options-default-resource-stickiness"
>> name="default-resource-stickiness" value="100"/>
>> <nvpair id="cib-bootstrap-options-default-resource-failure-stickiness"
>> name="default-resource-failure-stickiness" value="-100"/>
>> One node is Started and failure node is in Failed. When I stop heartbeat on
>> a Master node, failover is done very well, but If a Master node failst, the
>> failover isn't done.
>> Could be a bad RA ? Here is my master/slave RA:
> it's possible but hard to say because i don't know which actions
> failed (did a start fail too?) or what the rest of the scoring looks
I think the problem is when hearbeat "demotes" the failed master node,
there is an error there...
> its probably best if you create a hb_report and attach it to a new bugzilla.
Yes, I think about it, but I don't know if the problem is in Heartbeat
or in my RA... because this I don't make's a hb_report.
I will send here a hb_report and then if it is an heartbet's error I
will create a bug, is this ok ?
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
More information about the Linux-HA