[Linux-HA] A demand to the lrmd function.

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:45, Junko IKEDA <ikedaj at intellilink.co.jp> wrote:
>> I can only think of two things - system load (or CPU power, both of
>> which would affect the timing) and whether you both have stonith
>> enabled.
>
> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU            5160  @ 3.00GHz (x2)
> -> lrmd restart. That's it.

actually, i was wrong... if you're using "crm on" then the node should
(based on how the code works) always commit suicide.
can you create a bug and attach a hb_report for this case please?

>
> Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz (x2)
> -> lrmd restart, and somehow, heartbeat signoff crmd.
>   System reboot, after all.
>
>> Actually a third thing is the use of "crm yes" or "crm respawn" would
>> also affect this.
>
> Both of them, "crm on"
> I wonder why...
> I have to find some other differences.
>
>>
>> Are any of these things different between the two clusters?
>>
>> > Which is the appropriate behavior for heartbeat when lrmd is killed;
>> > restart lrmd or system reboot?
>>
>> Partly it depends on your preference.
>>
>> My personal belief is that when STONITH is enabled, rebooting the node
>> when any of the v2 processes exit offers no additional protection to
>> beyond that provided by STONITH and makes the recovery time longer.
>>
>> Others have been known to disagree :-)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>