[Linux-HA] Three questions on "failcount" attribute
Andrew Beekhof
beekhof at gmail.com
Thu Apr 10 02:40:00 MDT 2008
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Dominik Klein <dk at in-telegence.net> wrote:
> Martin Knoblauch wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > three questions on the "failcount" attribute. I am running 2.0.8, and yes
> I know I should upgrade ... :-(
> >
>
> Good to know you know :)
>
>
>
> > a) Is it possible that the "failcount" for a ressource/node is only
> available after a failure? On a not-yet-failed ressource I see:
> >
> >
> > > root at isdl601 sbin # ./crm_failcount -G -U isdl601 -r caebench.proc
> > > name=fail-count-caebench.proc value=(null)
> > > Error performing operation: The object/attribute does not exist
> > >
> >
> > Is this intentional?
> >
>
> At least the normal behaviour.
in that version
>
>
>
> > From a consistency point of view, creating it with a value of "0" would
> make sense. RFE?
> >
> > b) It would be nice to have "crm_mon" display the failcounts for all
> resources on all nodes, or mark nodes with any failcount > 0 as "failed" or
> "online/failed". RFE?
> >
>
> Yep, would be nice. Request that as an enhancement in the bugzilla.
which is what happens in newer version :)
More information about the Linux-HA
mailing list