[Linux-HA] Creating groups after the resources

[Andrew Beekhof]

On 7/6/07, Ciro Iriarte <cyruspy at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/7/6, Andrew Beekhof <beekhof at gmail.com>:
> > On 7/6/07, Ciro Iriarte <cyruspy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 2007/7/6, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at suse.de>:
> > > > On 2007-07-06T07:33:09, Ciro Iriarte <cyruspy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Sorry, i wasn't clear... I already have resources created, they are
> > > > > not grouped. Can i create new groups and include in them my already
> > > > > defined resources?
> > > >
> > > > It should work, yes.
> > > >
> > > > Assuming you're aware that you cannot include master_slave or clone
> > > > inside a group, that is. (But of course connect them using constraints.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >     Lars
> > > >
> > > Didn't know about that limitation...
> > >
> > > Assuming i have a FileSystem to DRBD (master/slave) dependency, would
> > > it be safe to just include de Filesystem on a group? and to leave the
> > > DRBD resource out?.
> > >
> > > How should i create/modify the group to add resources?, just
> > > mentioning the id of the already created resource?
> >
> > no, you cant do that.
> > you'd need to move the resource's complete definition into the group
> >
> > but it still might end up restarting the resource, though i'm not sure
> >
>
> By "moving" do you mean export/delete/modify/import?

yep

> , or is there
> another nicer procedure?