[Linux-HA] About how to return the resource that fails inthestart processing

YAMAUCHI HIDEO renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
Mon Jul 2 08:20:06 MDT 2007


Hi

A log and an configuration file were appended.

> > In conclusion, isn't there means in the current version except
> reactivation?
>
> There is. crm_resource -C, as I wrote.
The thing that the resource returns to the first node according to the
following procedures was confirmed.

1)crm_resource -C -r prmDummy1 -U hbtest03
   The status of CIB was cleared.
2)crm_failcount -D -r prmDummy1 -U hbtest03
   The resource has not moved yet.
3)crm_resource -M -r prmDummy1 -U hbtest03
   The resource returned to the first node.

Is it good in the usage of this command?

Moreover, another problem was in the development
version(Heartbeat-Dev-94d9a8c98f92.tar.gz).
As for the development version, the configuration file is made the same.
However, Fail Over is not done in the development version even if the first
failing in the start with the node.
At this time, it failed with the first node.

Should I register this problem of the development version in bugzilla?


Regard,
 Yamauchi


> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-ha-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org
> [mailto:linux-ha-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org]On Behalf Of Lars
> Marowsky-Bree
> Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 7:11 PM
> To: General Linux-HA mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] About how to return the resource that
> fails inthestart processing
>
>
> On 2007-07-01T09:31:02, YAMAUCHI HIDEO <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > > It's an on-going discussion between Andrew and myself whether start
> > > failures should not simply increase the failcount by a configurable
> > > amount as well - if this defaulted to INFINITY, the current behaviour
> > > would still apply, but finer granularity would also be possible.
> >
> > It has understood.
> > We will wait ..what discussion it becomes...
> >
> > In conclusion, isn't there means in the current version except
> reactivation?
>
> There is. crm_resource -C, as I wrote.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cib.xml
Type: text/xml
Size: 5185 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.community.tummy.com/pipermail/linux-ha/attachments/20070702/05584758/cib-0001.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ha.cf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 302 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.community.tummy.com/pipermail/linux-ha/attachments/20070702/05584758/ha-0001.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ha-log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 83560 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.community.tummy.com/pipermail/linux-ha/attachments/20070702/05584758/ha-log-0001.obj


More information about the Linux-HA mailing list