[Linux-HA] "one-way" dependency
Lars Marowsky-Bree
lmb at suse.de
Wed Feb 28 09:56:44 MST 2007
On 2007-02-28T09:11:20, Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh> wrote:
> The symmetrical option should be applited to the rsc_colocation item I
> believe, instead of the rsc_order. AND you have to be running >= 2.0.8
It'll do what he needs by default in 2.0.8 and up.
> Ordering has never been symmetric - as that actually doesn't make any
> sense. A cannot be before B and at the same time have B be before A.
Ordering constraints have actually always been symmetric, in that they
caused the corresponding dependency in the opposite direction as well:
start A after B implies stop A before B.
More information about the Linux-HA
mailing list