[Linux-HA] grouping cloned resources?

[Andrew Beekhof]

On 2/23/07, Andrew Beekhof <beekhof at gmail.com> wrote:
> yes, when nothing is set we should make sure the value we default to
> is then set in the environment
>
> On 2/23/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at suse.de> wrote:
> > On 2007-02-23T10:59:52, Andrew Beekhof <beekhof at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > actually it seems the problem stems from the Filesystem checking for
> > > OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_clone_max (which isnt always set because its
> > > implied) instead of OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_clone
> >
> > Oh. This seems to have worked here.
> >
> > Did we not discuss that it should _default_ to the number of nodes in
> > the cluster? If so, I think this number should also be exposed to the
> > RA, if it isn't too much hassle.
> >
> > (Same for the other clone_/master_ values, even when they are at their
> > defaults - otherwise, we have to maintain two sets of default values.)
> >
> > > i made a small change to the RA:
> > > http://hg.beekhof.net/lha/crm-dev/rev/959f2c429fc3
> >
> > The change is good nevertheless as the ocfs2 extension doesn't really
> > need it, yes.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >
>