[Linux-HA] grouping cloned resources?

[Andrew Beekhof]

yes, when nothing is set we should make sure the value we default to
is then set in the environment

On 2/23/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at suse.de> wrote:
> On 2007-02-23T10:59:52, Andrew Beekhof <beekhof at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > actually it seems the problem stems from the Filesystem checking for
> > OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_clone_max (which isnt always set because its
> > implied) instead of OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_clone
>
> Oh. This seems to have worked here.
>
> Did we not discuss that it should _default_ to the number of nodes in
> the cluster? If so, I think this number should also be exposed to the
> RA, if it isn't too much hassle.
>
> (Same for the other clone_/master_ values, even when they are at their
> defaults - otherwise, we have to maintain two sets of default values.)
>
> > i made a small change to the RA:
> > http://hg.beekhof.net/lha/crm-dev/rev/959f2c429fc3
>
> The change is good nevertheless as the ocfs2 extension doesn't really
> need it, yes.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>