[Linux-HA] Two node, two IP resource, config problem?

[Andrew Beekhof]

On 9/11/06, Robert Gravsjö <robert.gravsjo at tietoenator.com> wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On 9/8/06, Robert Gravsjö <robert.gravsjo at tietoenator.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Oren Nechushtan wrote:
> >> > Did you try the patch Andrew supplied? It worked for me.
> >> > See
> >> http://lists.community.tummy.com/pipermail/linux-ha/2006-August/021391.html
> >>
> >> >
> >> > 13 days agoFilter out updates that arent for cluster members (eg.
> >> ping nodes)
> >> >
> >> > changeset
> >> > Andrew Beekhof <beekhof at gmail.com> [Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:42:40 +0200]
> >> rev 9564
> >> >
> >> > Filter out updates that arent for cluster members (eg. ping nodes)
> >>
> >> I tried this patch and it fixed the failover problem.
> >>
> >> The OFFLINE problem still occurs. A node with its network cables removed
> >> will stay OFFLINE in crm_mon despite the fact that it is back online.
> >
> > How can the other node(s) know the "failed" node is "back" if its
> > network cables are unplugged?
>
> There are additional networks attached to these servers. One of these
> other networks are dedicated to heartbeat communication.
> So, since heartbeat is able to communicate with the other node it should
> also be aware of it resuming normal operations. The log shows entries
> about it being back, but crm_mon shows it OFFLINE and crmadmin says "idle".

Can you include some logs (as bzip attachments) and h.cf on both nodes?

> >> The difference this time is that restarting heartbeat results in both
> >> node starting up group net_1 and no one runs group_1.
> >
> > Is this a two node cluster?
>
> Yes, this is a two node cluster sharing two IP addresses (one for the
> primary network and one for the secondary).

ok - thats good