[Linux-HA] Two node, two IP resource, config problem?

[John R Mocho]

We are using v2 for production, staging, Q/A, and development.

   And it's great!  Better than any version of $uN Cluster I have run in 
over the last 6 years.

John.

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Robert Gravsjö wrote:

> Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:05:00 +0200
> From: Robert Gravsjö <robert.gravsjo at tietoenator.com>
> Reply-To: General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha at lists.linux-ha.org>
> To: General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha at lists.linux-ha.org>
> Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Two node, two IP resource, config problem?
> 
>
>
> Oren Nechushtan wrote:
>> Did you try the patch Andrew supplied? It worked for me.
>> See http://lists.community.tummy.com/pipermail/linux-ha/2006-August/021391.html
>>
>> 13 days agoFilter out updates that arent for cluster members (eg. ping nodes)
>>
>> changeset
>> Andrew Beekhof <beekhof at gmail.com> [Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:42:40 +0200] rev 9564
>>
>> Filter out updates that arent for cluster members (eg. ping nodes)
>
> I tried this patch and it fixed the failover problem.
>
> The OFFLINE problem still occurs. A node with its network cables removed
> will stay OFFLINE in crm_mon despite the fact that it is back online.
>
> The difference this time is that restarting heartbeat results in both
> node starting up group net_1 and no one runs group_1.
>
> Is any v2.x ready for production environment? Or should I revert back to
> v1 if I want to use heartbeat in production environment?
>
>
> Regards,
> roppert
>
>
>>
>> Oren.
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: linux-ha-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org
>>> [mailto:linux-ha-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org]On Behalf Of
>>> robert.gravsjo at tietoenator.com
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:03 PM
>>> To: General Linux-HA mailing list
>>> Subject: [Linux-HA] Two node, two IP resource, config problem?
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I having trouble understanding the behavior I see when using the
>>> attached configuration.
>>> The scenario is pretty simple: as long as net_1 has some connectivity
>>> stay on active node else failover net_1 and group_1 to the other node.
>>>
>>> Now, the strangeness is that if I use ifconfig to bring my interfaces
>>> down the failover occurs as expected but if I physicly pull
>>> the plug on
>>> the active nodes interfaces the failover does not occur. Insted the
>>> active node is set to OFFLINE and all resources in group_1 is
>>> stopped on
>>> both nodes. I can't understand why?
>>>
>>> The second thing is that after a failover heartbeat doesnt accept the
>>> failed node even if it comes back online. crm_mon still shows
>>> that node
>>> as OFFLINE. Restarting heartbeat manually on that node makes it online
>>> again. I'm not sure why this happens either?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> roppert
>>>
>>> --
>>> RobertG
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>>
>
> -- 
> RobertG
>
> Phone: +46 (0)480 44 58 35
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>