[Linux-HA] Correct way to run BasicSanityCheck?

[Alan Robertson]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John Felczak wrote:
> What is the officially correct way to run BasicSanityCheck?
> 
> In the course of troubleshooting an earlier problem, I've built
> heartbeat 2.0.7 from source on a machine in our test lab that runs
> the same OS (64-bit Fedora Core 5) as our production systems, and now
> am trying to run BasicSanityCheck against it.
> 
> The comments at the beginning of the script say "CANNOT have a real
> heartbeat configuration".  Am I correct in assuming that this means I
> need to rename or remove ha.cf, haresources, authkeys, cib.xml, etc.?
> 
> 
> I tried it that way (renamed the existing files) and came up with 13
> errors, but not sure if those are because I'm running the script
> incorrectly (i.e., script looks like it's complaining about things
> that haven't been configured) or whether there are really problems
> with this current installation.
> 
> I've attached a gzipped tarball of the log produced by
> BasicSanityCheck.

In spite of the comments, it will move them to the side and put them back.

There is basically no wrong way to run BSC.  Unlike CTS, it's pretty
simple to run.

Your 13 errors are real.  It isn't installed correctly.  Installing from
RPM is a good idea.

Why don't you install the fedora packages of heartbeat?

You should just be able to do this...

	$ sudo yum install heartbeat

- --
    Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh>

"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship...  Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE+bTMNkLhYXF6ZA4RAtONAJ0d52MjH2u+0obFeSGAvH8e8Sx9awCeM82m
rp93/cUaXCp9DouHKtccO4o=
=+EVI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----