[Linux-HA] request for suggestions on proper setup.

[Tony Boucher]

Jason,

What are the requirments? Do you need to do load balancing? Make an 
application highly available?

Regards,
Tony


Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson 
afterwards.

Vernon Sanders Law





>From: Jason <jason at monsterjam.org>
>Reply-To: General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha at lists.linux-ha.org>
>To: General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha at lists.linux-ha.org>
>Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] request for suggestions on proper setup.
>Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 23:03:49 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from new.community.tummy.com ([198.49.126.209]) by 
>bay0-mc10-f1.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Wed, 
>21 Jun 2006 20:41:50 -0700
>Received: from newcommunity.tummy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])by 
>new.community.tummy.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8F7203A050;Wed, 21 Jun 
>2006 21:41:27 -0600 (MDT)
>Received: from ms-smtp-04.southeast.rr.com 
>(ms-smtp-04.southeast.rr.com[24.25.9.103])by new.community.tummy.com 
>(Postfix) with ESMTP id 422C7203A04Efor <linux-ha at lists.linux-ha.org>; Wed, 
>21 Jun 2006 21:41:22 -0600 (MDT)
>Received: from monsterjam.org 
>(cpe-066-057-016-142.nc.res.rr.com[66.57.16.142])by 
>ms-smtp-04.southeast.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP idk5M33hGT014810for 
><linux-ha at lists.linux-ha.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 23:03:45 -0400 (EDT)
>Received: (qmail 95789 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Jun 2006 03:03:49 -0000
>X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2vGx6Gm77cKxtjrv26EL0EfCr2jTiZR3g=
>X-Original-To: linux-ha at lists.linux-ha.org
>Delivered-To: mailman+post-linux-ha at newcommunity.tummy.com
>References: <20060622004244.GB16095 at monsterjam.org> 
><4499FC97.9010502 at unix.sh>
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
>X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
>X-BeenThere: linux-ha at lists.linux-ha.org
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: General Linux-HA mailing list <linux-ha.lists.linux-ha.org>
>List-Unsubscribe: 
><http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha>,<mailto:linux-ha-request at lists.linux-ha.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://lists.community.tummy.com/pipermail/linux-ha>
>List-Post: <mailto:linux-ha at lists.linux-ha.org>
>List-Help: <mailto:linux-ha-request at lists.linux-ha.org?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: 
><http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha>,<mailto:linux-ha-request at lists.linux-ha.org?subject=subscribe>
>Errors-To: linux-ha-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org
>Return-Path: linux-ha-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2006 03:41:52.0638 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[CCE999E0:01C695AD]
>
> > In other words:  your configuration won't work. GFS doesn't yet play
> > well with others.
> >
> > If you're doing active/passive, then I don't understand the benefit that
> >  you expect GFS to bring.
>
>ok, so whats the actual mechanism in place here to release the filesystem 
>if the active node goes down or
>hangs? It appears in my case, i need STONITH?
>
>does this look like a better way to go?
>1. remove/unconfigure GFS
>2. set up STONITH for the shared disk.
>3. ????
>
>what would yall suggest?
>
>regards,
>Jason
>
>_______________________________________________
>Linux-HA mailing list
>Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
>http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems