[Linux-HA] HB 2.0.5 Xinetd ocf not working properly?

Nikola Ciprich extmaillist at linuxbox.cz
Thu Aug 3 08:16:34 MDT 2006


Hi all,
I've got a little question: I'm using active/active configuration, with 
CRM, and I have following problem:
averything works, but I also have 4 xinetd resources (pop3, pop3s, imap, 
imaps), and hb seems to have some trouble with them:
it seems that only first resource in config file is always 
started/stopped properly, although it seems everything is OK. others 3 
seem to be ignored.
here is snippet from my configuration:

         <primitive class="ocf" id="pop3_xinetd_ipop3" 
provider="heartbeat" type="Xinetd">
           <operations>
             <op id="pop3_xinetd_ipop3_mon" interval="120s" 
name="monitor" timeout="60s"/>
           </operations>
           <instance_attributes id="pop3_xinetd_ipop3_inst_attr">
             <attributes>
               <nvpair id="pop3_xinetd_ipop3_attr_0" name="service" 
value="ipop3"/>
             </attributes>
           </instance_attributes>
         </primitive>
         <primitive class="ocf" id="pop3_xinetd_pop3s" 
provider="heartbeat" type="Xinetd">
           <operations>
             <op id="pop3_xinetd_pop3s_mon" interval="120s" 
name="monitor" timeout="60s"/>
           </operations>
           <instance_attributes id="pop3_xinetd_pop3s_inst_attr">
             <attributes>
               <nvpair id="pop3_xinetd_pop3s_attr_0" name="service" 
value="ipop3"/>
             </attributes>
           </instance_attributes>
         </primitive>
         <primitive class="ocf" id="pop3_xinetd_imap" 
provider="heartbeat" type="Xinetd">
           <operations>
             <op id="pop3_xinetd_imap_mon" interval="120s" 
name="monitor" timeout="60s"/>
           </operations>
           <instance_attributes id="pop3_xinetd_imap_inst_attr">
             <attributes>
               <nvpair id="pop3_xinetd_imap_attr_0" name="service" 
value="ipop3"/>
             </attributes>
           </instance_attributes>
         </primitive>

any clues what could be wrong?
thanks a lot in advance!
nik



More information about the Linux-HA mailing list