[Linux-HA] Ipfail support for heartbeat 2.0.x
beekhof at gmail.com
Wed Oct 19 00:38:02 MDT 2005
On 10/18/05, Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh> wrote:
> Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> > On 2005-10-18T13:41:57, Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh> wrote:
> >>I had a slightly different thought...
> >>If we did this based on variables, then it wouldn't be _too_ hard to
> >>make variable setting from external programs to be hysteresis damped...
> >>In other words, wait until time 't' has elapsed before calling the PE
> >>for a change in a variable. 't' could presumably be somehow specified
> >>in the CIB.
> >>This would make it universally available, and since the DC only runs on
> >>one machine, the hysteresis damping would be easier.
> > Last time I suggested implementing it in the DC/CIB/PE, I'm very sure
> > you shot me down for suggesting to make it more complex then it already
> > was and that it ought to be implemented as an external daemon.
> > If implementing it in the CIB is by now acceptable, I'm for sure not
> > arguing ;-)
> Actually, the last time, I think the whole thing (ip monitoring and
> everything) was in the CIB. I'm only proposing the hysteresis for
> variables be in the CIB.
> In this case, having it in the one common place for all variables is a
> simplification - since it can be done once instead of many times.
So what do people want? I'm not getting it...
It the PE detects a resource should be moved it will move it then and
there - not at some arbitrary point in the future.
> Alan Robertson <alanr at unix.sh>
> "Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
> claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
More information about the Linux-HA