[Linux-HA] Stonith question

[hm at seneca.muc.de]

Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at suse.de> wrote:
> That doesn't make sense. There can't be a communication failure between
> them, because as you said in your original mail, the primary takes over
> the resources just fine from the secondary, and _then_ invokes STONITH.

It's not impossible that it was that way round. 

> Of course, in addition to this discussion on the mailing list, you're
> then entitled to official support via our support channels. Which would

Wilco. I'll get the log files manana and open the call. I'm really curious
about this.  

-- 
Someone will try to honk your nose today.