[Linux-ha-dev] 3.0 thoughts (dopd)

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Aug 22, 2008, at 8:00 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 03:13:13PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> On 2008-08-19T15:02:09, Rasto Levrinc <rasto at linbit.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> - Remove code which depends on pacemaker (mgmt, dopd, CIM/SNMP)
>>>> - Remove unmaintained code (telecom/).
>>> dopd does not depend on crm directly, but it uses clplumbing. Can  
>>> it stay
>>> there?
>>
>> Ah, right, dopd stays then I think.
>>
>> Though I'd prefer if it built within drbd.
>
> back then when I "forced" it into heartbeat mercurial,
> we where not able to built it againts "heartbeat headers only".
>
> if it can now be successfully build against latest heartbeat-dev,

it should be possible - afterall, the entire CRM is now built  
separately.
and of course if there is some reason it won't, we'd be eager to know  
so we can fix it.

>
> or whatever the correct header dependency package would be,
> and the resulting binary will still work with all the various
> (potentially older) heartbeat versions out there,
> we shall be happy to relieve you from that burden
> and carry around our bugs ourselves again.
>
> should it be possible to build one dopd binary against
> latest distributed heartbeat header packages,
> and have it work on different versions of heartbeat?
>
> btw,
> there are rumors about a dopd
> for the openais comm layer ;)
>
> -- 
> : Lars Ellenberg
> : LINBIT HA-Solutions GmbH
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev at lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/