[Linux-ha-dev] Lrmd creeping processor utilization

[Simon Talbot]

Just selectively applied the two patches, would it be better to switch to CVS/A Snapshot for testing, if so which is the best to work from? 

Simon

Simon Talbot MEng, ACGI 
(Chief Engineer) 
Tel: 020 3161 6001
Fax: 020 3161 6011

The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments are private 
and confidential and may be legally privileged. 

It is intended for the named addressee(s) only. If you are not the 
intended recipient(s), you must not read, copy or use the information 
contained in any way. If you receive this email or any attachments in 
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and destroy any copy you 
have of it. 

We accept no responsibility for any loss or damages whatsoever arising 
in any way from receipt or use of this e-mail or any attachments. This 
e-mail is not intended to create legally binding commitments on our 
behalf, nor do its comments reflect our corporate views or policies. 
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-ha-dev-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org [mailto:linux-ha-dev-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Lars Marowsky-Bree
Sent: 12 October 2007 12:14
To: High-Availability Linux Development List
Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Lrmd creeping processor utilization

On 2007-10-12T00:47:11, Simon Talbot <simont at nse.co.uk> wrote:

> Thanks Dejan,
> 
> I have implemented the patches across the cluster and will observe the 
> behaviour,

Have you selectivelyu applied the patch or moved the cluster to the latest code base?


Regards,
    Lars

--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde

_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev at lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/