[Linux-ha-dev] Lrmd creeping processor utilization
simont at nse.co.uk
Fri Oct 12 05:29:54 MDT 2007
Just selectively applied the two patches, would it be better to switch to CVS/A Snapshot for testing, if so which is the best to work from?
Simon Talbot MEng, ACGI
Tel: 020 3161 6001
Fax: 020 3161 6011
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments are private
and confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended for the named addressee(s) only. If you are not the
intended recipient(s), you must not read, copy or use the information
contained in any way. If you receive this email or any attachments in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and destroy any copy you
have of it.
We accept no responsibility for any loss or damages whatsoever arising
in any way from receipt or use of this e-mail or any attachments. This
e-mail is not intended to create legally binding commitments on our
behalf, nor do its comments reflect our corporate views or policies.
From: linux-ha-dev-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org [mailto:linux-ha-dev-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Lars Marowsky-Bree
Sent: 12 October 2007 12:14
To: High-Availability Linux Development List
Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Lrmd creeping processor utilization
On 2007-10-12T00:47:11, Simon Talbot <simont at nse.co.uk> wrote:
> Thanks Dejan,
> I have implemented the patches across the cluster and will observe the
Have you selectivelyu applied the patch or moved the cluster to the latest code base?
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev at lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
More information about the Linux-HA-Dev